

When will players get paid in IGT casino settlement The class attorneys argued users were entitled to pursue their losses under a Washington state law. Tens of thousands of class members “purchased and lost chips” by wagering at DoubleDown Casino, the plaintiffs’ lawyers alleged. The lawsuit said consumers wager to acquire more chips that they otherwise would need to buy. The games are free to play, but users pay for additional chips. Share of consumers will depend on, among other things, (1) the total dollar amount of in-game purchases a player made while playing DoubleDown Casino, DoubleDown Fort Knox, DoubleDown Classic, and/or Ellen’s Road to Riches, with those who spent more money receiving a higher percentage of their money back, and (2) how many Settlement Class Members submitted claims. Those who filed timely and properly completed claims by Apwill be eligible to receive a share of the Settlement Fund via Zelle, Paypal, direct deposit, or a check according to a website operated by the plaintiff consumers.Īll individuals who played DoubleDown Casino, DoubleDown Fort Knox, DoubleDown Classic, and/or Ellen’s Road to Riches, while in the United States, on or before Novemwere eligible to file claims. Who are eligible for payment in social casino case: Online consumers alleged “social casino” games developed by the defendants “constitute unlawful gambling under Washington’s gambling laws.” The settlement was the latest in a series of related cases. The gaming companies denied all claims and that they violated any law, but have agreed to the settlement to avoid the uncertainties and expenses associated with continuing the case.

The case pertains to claims under Washington state law based on the sale of virtual chips in the following social casino-style games: DoubleDown Casino, DoubleDown Fort Knox, DoubleDown Classic, and Ellen’s Road to Riches. judge on Thursday approved a $415 million class-action settlement resolving claims that online gaming companies DoubleDown Interactive LLC and International Game Technology PLC violated Washington state gambling laws and consumer protection provisions.
